Re: fatal: bad revision 'HEAD'
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2009, 04:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090813043855.GA21158@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1vngmitn.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:36:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I honestly do not know of a sane reason (other than "because I can") > anybody would want to _start_ a new root in a repository with an existing > history. And doing a "pull" with or without --rebase immediately after > starting a new root is doubly insane, as you say.
IIRC, the reason I did it was to throw away history, starting a new root at the current state. Which is at least a little bit sane, though I think I might just do it with a graft and filter-branch these days.
> But that is the kind of "ending up to have" I am talking about; it is not > something you _aim to_ create on purpose. If you want to _start_ a > separate history, and if you are sane, you would start the separate > history in a separate repository.
Agreed. Let's not worry about it, then.
-Peff