Re: clone
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 20, 2009, 15:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090720152407.GC5347@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <D229D90E-0294-475D-B7AC-6C7B23CC169A@roalddevries.nl>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 04:33:51PM +0200, Roald de Vries wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> If I clone a repository with multiple branches to 'newdir', and then > type 'git branch' in 'newdir', I see only 1 branch. 'git branch -r' > gives me all branches. Is that correct behaviour? If so, why? And > mainly: can I configure git to clone all original branches to non- > remote branches?
Yes, it's correct. You really only need local branches of things you are going to work on. And then that happens, you generally would just "git checkout -b foo origin/foo" to make your own local "foo" branch that you will be working on (or if you are using topic branches, something more like "git checkout -b mytopic origin/master"). If you are just inspecting branches (e.g., checking them out to try building, doing diffs against them, using them as reference points for logging, etc), then the remote versions are fine.
-Peff