Re: Git Confusion
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 29, 2009, 13:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090529135242.GA30926@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3d49sauru.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:44:26AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Usually such a repo is bare, and gets updates only by push. In that > > case, enabling the update hook to run update-server-info is sufficient. > > But in your case, you are actually working on the remote repo via commit > > and other means, so there is no convenient way to always > > update-server-info after a change. > > Well, he can always add git-update-server-info to post-commit hook.
That covers committing, but what about reset, rebase, "branch -f", etc? I don't think there is a catch-all for all the ways that a repo can be updated locally.
> > Is there a particular reason you cloned over http instead of over ssh? > Or git protocol?
Yes, that would work fine, too. I mentioned ssh because he already indicated that he was able to ssh into the box (and may or may not have the git daemon set up).
-Peff