Re: [TopGit PATCH] tg-push: prevent multiple occurences of branches
- From
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- Date
- May 27, 2009, 07:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090527072100.GA13559@pengutronix.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <1243373820-13442-1-git-send-email-bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Hi Bert,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:37:00PM +0200, Bert Wesarg wrote:
Show 52 quoted lines
> So, I finally tried tg-push and got a lot of warnings and errors: > > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > warning, no base found top-bases/master > > > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/master is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/master > error: Ref refs/heads/bw/log is at a16df35cc7009b36f6f71717ae3d9a3dc29987da but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/heads/bw/log > error: Ref refs/top-bases/bw/log is at b725fc951a37854fc65945ac5bcab3bc61ccbd94 but expected 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > error: failed to lock refs/top-bases/bw/log > > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] bw/log -> bw/log (failed to lock) > ! [remote rejected] refs/top-bases/bw/log -> refs/top-bases/bw/log (failed to lock)
hhm, does this happen because
git push $remote master master master master
tries to lock master four times? I'd think this is something that needs fixing in git-core.
Show 7 quoted lines
> Also the result was ok this output is defintive not ok. > > To prevent multiple occurences of the same branchname we maintain these in a > file. > > In push_branch ref_exists was called, which is redundant because _dep_is_tgish > tells us exactly this.
... what about breaking this out?
Show 21 quoted lines
> ---
> tg-push.sh | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tg-push.sh b/tg-push.sh
> index 8d09a02..c813927 100644
> --- a/tg-push.sh
> +++ b/tg-push.sh
> @@ -45,31 +45,41 @@ for name in $branches; do
> ref_exists "$name" || die "detached HEAD? Can't push $name"
> done
>
> +_listfile="$(mktemp -t tg-push-listfile.XXXXXX)"
> +trap "rm -f \"$_listfile\"" 0
> +
> +# prevent multiple occurrences of the same branch
> +add_to_list()
> +{
> + fgrep -qx "$1" "$_listfile" ||
> + echo "$1" >> "$_listfile"
> +}This has complexity O(n**2) for n calls (I think). Just writing then to the list and doing sort -u afterwards only has O(n log n) (for a reasonable implementation of sort).
Show 6 quoted lines
> push_branch()
> {
> # if so desired omit non tgish deps
> $tgish_deps_only && [ -z "$_dep_is_tgish" ] && return 0
>
> - echo "$_dep"what about $tgish_deps_only?
Show 9 quoted lines
> - local base="top-bases/$_dep" > - if ref_exists "$base"; then > - echo "top-bases/$_dep" > - else > - echo "warning, no base found $base" 1>&2 > - fi > + add_to_list "$_dep" > + [ -z "$_dep_is_tgish" ] || > + add_to_list "top-bases/$_dep"
Best regards Uwe
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |