Re: [PATCH 4/5] bisect--helper: add "--next-exit" to output bisect results
- From
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- Date
- Apr 21, 2009, 05:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200904210757.55162.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vprf7k93h.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Le lundi 20 avril 2009, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
Show 12 quoted lines
> Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes: > > The goal of this patch is to port more shell code from the > > "bisect_next" function in "git-bisect.sh" to C code in > > "builtin-bisect--helper.c". > > > > So we port the code that interprets the bisection result and stops or > > continues (by checking out the next revision) the bisection process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> > > Just to make sure I understand correctly, with this and patch 5/5, we can > then drop the --next-vars helper command, right?
Yes, that's right. I just sent two patches to remove useless code.
Show 18 quoted lines
> > @@ -16,6 +17,12 @@ static const char **rev_argv;
> > static int rev_argv_nr;
> > static int rev_argv_alloc;
> >
> > +static const unsigned char *current_bad_sha1;
> > +
> > +static const char *argv_diff_tree[] = {"diff-tree", "--pretty", NULL,
> > NULL}; +static const char *argv_checkout[] = {"checkout", "-q", NULL,
> > "--", NULL}; +static const char *argv_show_branch[] = {"show-branch",
> > NULL, NULL};
>
> I do appreciate that you kept this step in "rewrite in C" theme a
> straight rewrite to still call out the executables. We can turn these
> into internal calls in future steps, but that is a separate issue.
>
> I suspect that the show-branch call outlived its usefulness with this
> patch; it will now be a low hanging fruit to call format_commit_message()
> internally to reduce one fork+exec.I will have a look at that.
Thanks, Christian.