Re: [PATCH 1/8] mergetool: use tabs consistently
- From
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2009, 06:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090331063613.GA20690@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090330213530.GA7091@hashpling.org>
On 0, Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:44:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I don't much like [1/8] though. I'm all in favour of consistency, but > this patch touches most of the lines in git-mergetool and tries to go > the opposite way to the consistency drive that we were trying to > introduce gradually (i.e. only through lines materially affected by > subsequent patches) in:
Sounds good. I'll re-roll and give the refactoring another go.
I think we can definitely do better, and more importantly, I think we can decouple things by using less globals.
Junio, did you have any comments about patch v2 "difftool: add support for difftool.prompt config variable"?
This series was based on top of that patch so I'm wondering if I should do that again.
Show 131 quoted lines
>
> commit 0eea345111a9b9fea4dd2841b80bc7d62964e812
> Author: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
> Date: Thu Nov 13 12:41:13 2008 +0000
>
> Fix some tab/space inconsistencies in git-mergetool.sh
>
> If you'd gone the other way the patch to consistency would only affect
> 23 lines rather than 347 lines and all bar 3 of these lines you
> subsequently remove from git-mergetool.sh in later patches anyway.
>
> [2/8] - looks good.
>
> [3/8] - no mergetool impact.
>
> [4/8] - Hmmm, OK. Even so at this point, I'm getting slightly iffy
> feelings about the whole init_merge_tool_path sets a variable needed
> by the calling script. I know it's only scripting and not programming,
> but it seemed less bad to set (global) variables in sh functions when
> they were all in the same sh script.
>
> [5/8] - no mergtool impact.
>
> [6/8] - ditto
>
> [7/8] - OK, here's where my uneasiness about global script variables
> vs. parameters really gets going. Why is merge_tool a parameter when
> it's setup once and doesn't change in the invocation of a script, yet
> base_present is a script global but can vary between sets of paths to
> be merged?
>
> I fully appreciate that this is just inheriting the way things are
> and that they weren't beautiful before, but it somehow seems even
> worse when the variables are set in one script and used from a
> function in a separate sourced script. We're definitely setting up a
> very strong coupling between the two scripts which will make it harder
> to change either in the future.
>
> [8/8] - no mergetool impact here.
>
> On the plus side, I really like the introduction and function of the
> run_mergetool function. It's exactly the split that will make
> extending mergetool resolves of file vs. symlink vs. directory easier
> in the future. I have a similar split in some slow brewing patches
> myself.
>
> I think that [1/8] is the only patch that I'd relucatant to ack, as it
> seems like unnecessary churn and change of direction. Here's a sample
> patch for consistency 'the other way'. As I mentioned before, the
> first to hunks are made redundant by your subsequent changes anyway,
> so I only counted 3 lines that are currently inconsistent in
> git-mergetool as it stands at the moment.
>
> Sample patch fixing consistent whitespace 'the other way'.
> ---
> git-mergetool.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-mergetool.sh b/git-mergetool.sh
> index 87fa88a..1588b5f 100755
> --- a/git-mergetool.sh
> +++ b/git-mergetool.sh
> @@ -344,29 +344,29 @@ valid_custom_tool()
> }
>
> valid_tool() {
> - case "$1" in
> - kdiff3 | tkdiff | xxdiff | meld | opendiff | emerge | vimdiff | gvimdiff | ecmerge)
> - ;; # happy
> - *)
> - if ! valid_custom_tool "$1"; then
> - return 1
> - fi
> - ;;
> - esac
> + case "$1" in
> + kdiff3 | tkdiff | xxdiff | meld | opendiff | emerge | vimdiff | gvimdiff | ecmerge)
> + ;; # happy
> + *)
> + if ! valid_custom_tool "$1"; then
> + return 1
> + fi
> + ;;
> + esac
> }
>
> init_merge_tool_path() {
> - merge_tool_path=`git config mergetool.$1.path`
> - if test -z "$merge_tool_path" ; then
> - case "$1" in
> - emerge)
> - merge_tool_path=emacs
> - ;;
> - *)
> - merge_tool_path=$1
> - ;;
> - esac
> - fi
> + merge_tool_path=`git config mergetool.$1.path`
> + if test -z "$merge_tool_path" ; then
> + case "$1" in
> + emerge)
> + merge_tool_path=emacs
> + ;;
> + *)
> + merge_tool_path=$1
> + ;;
> + esac
> + fi
> }
>
> prompt_after_failed_merge() {
> @@ -389,9 +389,9 @@ prompt_after_failed_merge() {
> if test -z "$merge_tool"; then
> merge_tool=`git config merge.tool`
> if test -n "$merge_tool" && ! valid_tool "$merge_tool"; then
> - echo >&2 "git config option merge.tool set to unknown tool: $merge_tool"
> - echo >&2 "Resetting to default..."
> - unset merge_tool
> + echo >&2 "git config option merge.tool set to unknown tool: $merge_tool"
> + echo >&2 "Resetting to default..."
> + unset merge_tool
> fi
> fi
>
> --
> 1.6.2.323.geaf6e
>
> --
> Charles Bailey
> http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/-- David