Re: [PATCH] '%S' option for pretty printing to support --source
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 6, 2009, 05:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090306052558.GC3426@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <86d4c5e00903051141u61a131beg26b3df95bafd65d3@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:41:44PM -0500, Deskin Miller wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > - gracefully block concurrent use of conflicting features > > I agree that any blocking should be graceful, but ultimately I find > the idea of disallowing features because they happen to use the same > underlying implementation distasteful. With a little work we should > be able to allow both with no problem.
Yes, I would prefer to avoid blocking if at all possible. But I included it as a last resort until things can be fixed correctly. IOW, by "graceful" I just meant "die with an error instead of segfaulting". Which would still arguably be a bug, but at least would clue the user in to what is happening.
Anyway, happy moving and I'll look forward to seeing your patch when it is ready. :)
-Peff