Re: Comments on "Understanding Version Control" by Eric S. Raymond
- From
Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2009, 09:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090205093415.GC20844@thyrsus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <buo63jpo21o.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> writes: > > I suspect Eric will disagree with me, but regardless of how he > > completes his paper, it will almost certainly end up taking sides one > > way or another on this controversy, at which point one side or the > > other of this particular disagreement will argue that Eric is really > > writing an advocacy paper pushing Bzr, Mercurial, or Git (depending on > > how he comes out on this issue). > > That was pretty clear from his comments on the emacs-devel mailing list > (2008-05 roughly). > > He spent a lot of time trying to sound impartial (and that he was "still > doing research"), but strongly gave the impression that he had already > made up his mind.
At the time, I leaned slightly towards Mercurial, but my reasons had nothing to do with the cluster of issues Ted is pointing at; rather, I liked hg for its interface simplicity.
I remain agnostic about the deep issues around renaming and user intentions - in part because I'm by no means sure I completely understand them yet.
-- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>