Re: read-only working copies using links
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 24, 2009, 19:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090124193508.GC18010@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <bd6139dc0901241043h7087316bgcbcb5d9085d603ef@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:43:20PM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 19:39, Chad Dombrova <chadrik@gmail.com> wrote: > > what's the case against it, other than the obvious, that it will take more > > work? > > Good question, I think it was mostly that, someone has to implement it > (possibly as part of packv4). Backwards compatibility is of course > always an concern, but I'm not too familiar with the subject, perhaps > other people on the list (or even those were at the gittogether) can > comment?
If I understand his proposal correctly, such objects must _not_ be part of a pack. The whole idea is splitting them _more_, not less.
-Peff