Re: "git-whatever" the new style vs. "git whatever"?

From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
Date: Dec 29, 2008, 20:47 UTC
Message-ID: <200812291447.01713.bss@iguanasuicide.net>
In-Reply-To: <87sko6lqmo.fsf_-_@jidanni.org>

On Monday 2008 December 29 13:37:19 jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> JCH> I think he is comparing "git am" and "git-am" the latter of which is
> JCH> now deprecated and largely removed from the end user.
>
> By the way, we here at the end user end have a hard time detecting if
> "git-whatever" the new style vs. "git whatever"...

That shouldn't be a problem for much longer because "git-whatever" will stop working. From what I understand, "git whatever" has always been the preferred form, and the fact that "git-whatever" worked was just a implementation detail.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss@iguanasuicide.net                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/