Re: Odd merge behaviour involving reverts

> Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes:
>
>> I think your explanation will help people if we make it part of the
>> documentation.  Especially because two different cases need two
>> different recovery methods, and people need to learn which is which.
>
> Sure.  It needs copyediting to make it readable standalone by not
> mentioning "your misunderstanding", inlining "earlier Linus's suggestion",
> etc., though.
>
> Patches welcome ;-)