Re: Grafting mis-aligned trees.
- From
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss03@volumehost.net>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2008, 23:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200811281701.46778.bss03@volumehost.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <492289B0.4010903@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Tuesday 2008 November 18 03:24, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Show 45 quoted lines
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. venit, vidit, dixit 17.11.2008 23:45: > > I haven't gotten a response from my subscription email, so please CC me > > on any replies. > > > > So, I've been managaing the source I had from a client project in git and > > have a non-linear history. Currently, two tips (production and testing) > > but there are many feature branches that were git-merge'd in, not > > rebased. > > > > Now, I've gotten the full tree. Turns out all the source code I was > > working on was in a subdirectory "project/web". I'd like to "graft" the > > *changes* I made onto the full tree. > > > > I figured this might be a job for git-filter-branch. Certainly, that did > > the job of moving all my changes into the subdirectory. But, now I want > > to do something that's a combination or git-rebase and git-filter-branch. > > I want to replay the *patches/deltas* (like rebase) on top of the full > > tree I have, but *maintain the non-liear history* (like filter-branch). > > > > Can anyone think of a recipe for me? > > > > Trees look something like this right now. > > > > <some history> -> FT > > > > TI -> <non-linear history> -> A -> <non-linear history> -> C > > \ \ \ > > -> PI ------------------------> B ------------------------> D > > > > I'd like to have it look something like: > > > > <some history> -> FT -> <non-linear history> -> A' -> <non-linear > > history> -> C' \ \ \ > > -> PI' ----------------------> B' -----------------------> D' > > > > A', B', C', and D' are different commits, but the diff (and history) > > between FT and A' is the same as the diff (and history) between TI and A. > > > > Again, please CC me on any replies. > > [CCing is customary here anyways.] > > So, your base directory for TI and FT is different, right? I.e.: In the > TI repo, your project sits at the root, whereas in the FT repo it sits > in project/web?
Yes.
> Has FT advanced since you took the initial subdir > snapshot for TI?
No. Well, maybe. I think the subdir diff is fairly trivial if not empty. TI is an import from the code actually present on the testing server. FT was the a subversion repository obtained later after some hullabaloo with the ex-development house.
Right now this tree is effectively all mine, so I can always graft in commits to synchronize the common subtree of FT and TI, if that makes things easier.
-- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss03@volumehost.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/