git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Grafting mis-aligned trees.

From
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss03@volumehost.net>
Date
Nov 28, 2008, 23:01 UTC
Message-ID
<200811281701.46778.bss03@volumehost.net>
In-Reply-To
<492289B0.4010903@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Tuesday 2008 November 18 03:24, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Show 45 quoted lines
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. venit, vidit, dixit 17.11.2008 23:45:
> > I haven't gotten a response from my subscription email, so please CC me
> > on any replies.
> >
> > So, I've been managaing the source I had from a client project in git and
> > have a non-linear history.  Currently, two tips (production and testing)
> > but there are many feature branches that were git-merge'd in, not
> > rebased.
> >
> > Now, I've gotten the full tree.  Turns out all the source code I was
> > working on was in a subdirectory "project/web".  I'd like to "graft" the
> > *changes* I made onto the full tree.
> >
> > I figured this might be a job for git-filter-branch.  Certainly, that did
> > the job of moving all my changes into the subdirectory.  But, now I want
> > to do something that's a combination or git-rebase and git-filter-branch.
> >  I want to replay the *patches/deltas* (like rebase) on top of the full
> > tree I have, but *maintain the non-liear history* (like filter-branch).
> >
> > Can anyone think of a recipe for me?
> >
> > Trees look something like this right now.
> >
> > <some history> -> FT
> >
> > TI -> <non-linear history> -> A -> <non-linear history> -> C
> >    \                            \                           \
> >     -> PI ------------------------> B ------------------------> D
> >
> > I'd like to have it look something like:
> >
> > <some history> -> FT -> <non-linear history> -> A' -> <non-linear
> > history> -> C' \                            \                           \
> > -> PI' ----------------------> B' -----------------------> D'
> >
> > A', B', C', and D' are different commits, but the diff (and history)
> > between FT and A' is the same as the diff (and history) between TI and A.
> >
> > Again, please CC me on any replies.
>
> [CCing is customary here anyways.]
>
> So, your base directory for TI and FT is different, right? I.e.: In the
> TI repo, your project sits at the root, whereas in the FT repo it sits
> in project/web?
Yes.
> Has FT advanced since you took the initial subdir 
> snapshot for TI?

No. Well, maybe. I think the subdir diff is fairly trivial if not empty. TI is an import from the code actually present on the testing server. FT was the a subversion repository obtained later after some hullabaloo with the ex-development house.

Right now this tree is effectively all mine, so I can always graft in commits to synchronize the common subtree of FT and TI, if that makes things easier.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     
Previous: Michael J GruberNext: Michael J Gruber
Message 3 of 7 in “Grafting mis-aligned trees.”
  1. Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.Nov 17, 2008
  2. Michael J GruberNov 18, 2008
  3. Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.Nov 28, 2008
  4. Michael J GruberDec 2, 2008
  5. Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.Dec 2, 2008
  6. Michael J GruberDec 2, 2008
  7. Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.Dec 2, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.