Re: git to libgit2 code relicensing
- From
- Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
- Date
- Nov 14, 2008, 21:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081114213352.GA12134@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
- In-Reply-To
- <491DE6CC.6060201@op5.se>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:59:56PM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I've put everyone who "owns" more than 500 lines of code > on the bcc list, figuring your permission is important > but that you don't want the hundreds (well, one can hope) > of emails from people saying "ok". The list of major owners > was generated with "git showners *.c" in a worktree from > the next branch of git.git.
I don't think, that your way for relicensing is bullet proof:
I consider many of my GIT patches as derived work from other parts of GIT, even if git blame is stating me as author. I can gurantee you, that I comply with the "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" point b, as its based on code out of git.git. But I can't tell you, from which files I reused code anymore.
Probably other people did the same.
Your method is ignoring such derived code.
mfg Martin Kögler