Re: pull --preserve-merges
- From
- Francis Galiegue <fg@one2team.net>
- Date
- Nov 8, 2008, 17:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200811081807.53199.fg@one2team.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0811081607300.30769@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Le Saturday 08 November 2008 16:08:41 Johannes Schindelin, vous avez écrit :
Show 15 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Stephen Haberman wrote: > > Awhile ago I brought up wanting to have a "rebase with preserve merges" > > option for `git pull` > > That might be something you want, but you cannot call it > > git pull --preserve-merges > > since everybody used to "pull = fetch && merge" would go "Huh? A merge > _does_ preserve merges". > > If at all, you could call it "--rebase=preserve-merges". >
Why not --rebase --keep-merges? Personnally, I think it makes things clearer since in general options are either standalone or have a value.
-- fge