Re: Terminology question: "tracking" branches

From: Björn Steinbrink <b.steinbrink@gmx.de>
Date: Oct 27, 2008, 16:17 UTC
Message-ID: <20081027161736.GJ3612@atjola.homenet>
In-Reply-To: <4905E1B0.8040601@xiplink.com>

On 2008.10.27 11:43:44 -0400, Marc Branchaud wrote:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>
>> remote tracking branch: Synonymous with tracking branch. [remote is a
>> noun, an object for track here]
>
> Er, "remote" is an adjective there...  :)

Hm? It's a "branch that tracks (a branch of) a remote". Looks like a noun to me.

Show 7 quoted lines

>> [adjective to be found] branch: A local branch which is set up to pull
>> or rebase automatically from a tracking branch. Used for local
>> modifications to remote branches. [I'm tempted to use local tracking
>> branch here, but that would just add to the confusion.]
>
> I say there's no need for an adjective here, as this is just a plain old  
> branch that git-branch creates by default (right?).

By default, no. It depends on the branch.automergesetup configuration and whether you create the branch from a remote tracking branch, a local branch or some other committish.

autosetupmerge = false ---- git branch foo origin/foo --> --no-track git branch foo master --> --no-track git branch foo origin/foo^0 --> --no-track

autosetupmerge = true ---- git branch foo origin/foo --> --track git branch foo master --> --no-track git branch foo origin/foo^0 --> --no-track

autosetupmerge = always ---- git branch foo origin/foo --> --track git branch foo master --> --track git branch foo origin/foo^0 --> --no-track

> What's needed is an adjective for when git-branch is given the  
> --no-track option (or when branch.automergesetup is false).  
> "Non-tracking branch" perhaps?

Isn't that easily confused with "[remote] tracking branch"? Especially since the "remote" is optional...

Björn