Re: Feature Request: Branch Annotations
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Oct 9, 2008, 00:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081009002019.GQ536@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <32541b130810081621k32493e20occba9cd97671775d@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:21:33PM -0400, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess bash completions would help with this (if you're using bash), > but even then it's kind of unreasonable to name branches something > like "bug-111234-widget-performance-improvements-for-customer-x",
I think you haven't read the links mentioned in the previous mail.
IIRC the thread had a suggestion about creating such a 'desc' branch, then you could just have a branch named 'fix' and you could do git show desc:fix to see its description.
Just use git as a filesystem, as it was originally designed... ;-)