Re: What's cooking in git/spearce.git (Oct 2008, #01; Mon, 06)

From: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Date: Oct 6, 2008, 20:48 UTC
Message-ID: <20081006154849.6317f314.stephen@exigencecorp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081006165943.GG8203@spearce.org>

Show 12 quoted lines

> * sh/maint-rebase3 (Sun Oct 5 23:26:52 2008 -0500) 1 commit
>  - rebase--interactive: fix parent rewriting for dropped commits
> 
> A replacement for sh/maint-intrebase.  Its in pu because I have
> gotten 3 different versions of this patch, two of them posted a
> full 4 days after I merged the first version into next.  I felt
> burned by the patch author for not keeping up with my tree, so I'm
> not merging the patch to next.
>
> At this point its going to sit in pu until Junio comes back.
> I think the topic needs a few more days to settle to see if the
> patch author is going to submit any more revisions.

All fair enough.

Sorry for not keeping up with your tree--this was the first I heard my first patch had made it into next, so I kept submitting new ones not really knowing why they weren't generating feedback. My fault for not actively looking into the pu/next thing--I'll know what to do next time.

Thanks, Stephen