Re: interactive rebase not rebasing
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Oct 1, 2008, 18:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081001183135.GL21310@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081001121321.5761fc7e.stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> > > > I've attempted to do that. Now that I sent in the patch, if you could > > > review it, I would appreciate your feedback. > > > > I'm heading home from work now. I'll look it over tonight or tomorrow > > morning. > > Cool, thanks. > > Question: how taboo is it to just add another test file? > > I can suffer through getting it to work, but a t3409 would be much > easier, and probably easier to read as well as a I could setup my own > DAG instead of hacking onto 3404s.
Usually folks prefer to add stuff to an existing test file, but if the DAG is already a mess and you need a different DAG I find it easier to just add new test file. Thus far Junio hasn't pushed back when I've done that. Maybe I'm just lucky. :-)
-- Shawn.