Re: having to pull twice
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Sep 29, 2008, 15:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080929150049.GT23137@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200809281726.23062.trast@student.ethz.ch>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:26:20PM +0200, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> IIUC, this is not the same as "racy git". The racy case is if you > manage to get a file changed immediately after its index entry was > updated, so that it will look unchanged. In this case, it's simply > the same file with a new mtime, which means it looks changed > superficially but still has the same contents.
Right. I called it "racy" because it had something to do with timestamps. I guess we have no proper term for this kind of problem yet. ;-)