Re: [RFC/PATCH] remove vim syntax highlighting in favor of upstream
- From
Garry Dolley <gdolley@arpnetworks.com>
- Date
- Sep 24, 2008, 18:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080924183933.GA30265@garry-thinkpad.arpnetworks.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080924175315.GA10337@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:53:15PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> [Tim Pope cc'd as the author of the official version. Tim: just an FYI, > but if you have any comments, please feel free to share] > > [Shawn cc'd as the interim maintainer. I, for one, welcome our > new Java-programming overlords]. > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 07:01:54PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > > > Is there any objection to simply removing it (and probably replacing it > > > with a note to go look at the official highlighting file)? > > I'm for it, because I didn't know that there is an official git syntax > > highlight file out there. Indeed, I haven't even know that vim 7.2 is > > out. > > Here is a patch, then. Shawn, we should probably give any vim users a > few days to object in case there is something they don't like about the > upstream version, but other than that, I think this should be applied to > master.
As a Vim user, I think removing the syntax file, and giving a reference to the official one, is fine.
-- Garry Dolley ARP Networks, Inc. http://scie.nti.st Los Angeles County REACT, Unit 336 WQGK336