Re: Help breaking up a large merge.
- From
David Brown <git@davidb.org>
- Date
- Sep 18, 2008, 16:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080918162507.GA878@linode.davidb.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <adf1fd3d0809180855l42af4fb6l67275daef0d2a529@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:55:34PM +0200, Santi Béjar wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>If the two (or at least one) branches have sufficient isolated commits >you can recreate the merges that could have happened, as is explained >(for monotone) in: > >http://www.venge.net/mtn-wiki/ZipperMerge > >Another option is to rebase one branch onto the other.
Either of these is likely to result in more work. Both branches have intermediate results, and there has been some communication between the developers of each branch, so some things are closer at the two tips than they would be at intermediate stages.
I started with this approach, and started realizing that I was resolving similar conflicts repeatedly (not the same, or rerere could have helped).
Basically, I'm looking for a way to break the merge effort up by groups of files/directories.
Thanks, David