Re: Grafts workflow for a "shallow" repository...?
- From
Björn Steinbrink <b.steinbrink@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 16, 2008, 08:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080916080908.GA14272@atjola.homenet>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3ak08v5l.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 2008.09.15 23:25:10 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 28 quoted lines
> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes: > > > Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is my attempt at a "let's publish a shallow repository for branch > >> of moodle". Let me show you what I did... > > ... > >> # 1.7 was a significant release, anything earlier than that > >> # is just not interesting -- even for pickaxe/annotate purposes > >> # so add a graft point right at the branching point. > > ... > >> Is this kind of workflow (or a variation of it) supported? For this to > >> work, we should communicate the grafts in some push operations and > >> read them in clone ops - and perhaps in fetch too. > > ... > > I think that in this case the best thing to do is give users > > a shell script that does roughly: > > > > git init > > echo $BASE >.git/info/grafts > > git remote add -f origin $url > > git checkout -b master origin/master > > > > Sign the script, and let users verify it before executing. You may > > also want a script to drag in the history behind by removing the > > graft and fetching $BASE^, but that is hard because your repository > > already "has" that. > > Why not just filter-branch _once at the origin_ and publish the result?
I think the idea was to have a shallow clone starting at a certain point, as opposed to the --depth option, where you cannot specify a starting point, but only the depth of the clone.
Björn