Re: RFC: perhaps a "new file" should not be deleted by "git reset --hard"
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2008, 15:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080912154126.GW4829@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <279b37b20809111649h77666a46u362dddfa1b40e0ca@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:49:54PM -0700, Eric Raible <raible@gmail.com> wrote:
> What advantages does "git read-tree -m HEAD" have over "git reset" or > "git rm --cached <file list>"?
Nothing. I should stop advertising that I still use a lot of plumbing when a porcelain like 'git reset' does the job as well. ;-(
Thanks for the correction.