Re: [JGIT PATCH 1/2] Issue 23: Resolve tag^0 as tag^{commit}
- From
Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2008, 06:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200809120847.13541.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080912000007.GA31931@diku.dk>
fredagen den 12 september 2008 02.00.07 skrev Jonas Fonseca:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> wrote Fri, Sep 12, 2008:
> > torsdagen den 11 september 2008 23.39.27 skrev Jonas Fonseca:
> > > Repository.resolve("tag^0") failed with "not a commit". Fix it and add a
> > > test case for it.
> >
> > It seems this case is not *that* special. It is tag^N == tag^{commit}^N
> > Same for tag~N == tag^{commit}~N-
>
> git-rev-parse(1) says:
>
> · A suffix ^ to a revision parameter means the first parent of that
> commit object. ^<n> means the <n>th parent (i.e. rev^ is
> equivalent to rev^1). As a special rule, rev^0 means the commit
> itself and is used when rev is the object name of a tag object that
> refers to a commit object.
>
> but does take tag^1, however not tag^2. It looks like tag~N is broken intag^2 means you have a merge commit. I think rev^0 is mentioned here to mean that it is actually defined (and how).
Show 9 quoted lines
> JGit ("not a commit") so should also be fixed if we want to be
> compatible with git-rev-parse.
>
> BTW, I just noticed that ^{} is not handled correctly either for tags.
> · A suffix ^ followed by an empty brace pair (e.g. v0.99.8^{}) means
> the object could be a tag, and dereference the tag recursively
> until a non-tag object is found.
>
> Only one derefence is performed.Good catch!
Show 25 quoted lines
> > My fault, i guess, but it would be nice of you fixed it while you are at it. > > I will try to make fixes for the above cases tomorrow. > > > Second, the testcase in the second patch fails on my machine. > > > > testDerefTaggedTagTree(org.spearce.jgit.lib.T0008_testparserev) > > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[269e1253bad5c247c6bde37aa48ae1e03138206c]> but was:<[be83157b4ffe650d728ba4f98ad47b623b0d0c20]> > > at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81) > > at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87) > > at org.spearce.jgit.lib.T0008_testparserev.testDerefTaggedTagTree(T0008_testparserev.java:123) > > I reran all the test before formatting the patch, but after doing some > last minut changes. When I run all the tests using maven (inside > NetBeans or from the command line) it tells me: > > Tests run: 428, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > From the output it looks like the tests in the files named T000* are > never run. However, where the breakage is (could be my setup) I don't > know. Imran? > > Anyway, for now I will just run the single test specifically. Perhaps I > should just put this into the same patch. Anyway, the following should > fix it.
Yes, please resubmit after updating the rev-parsing code.
Show 14 quoted lines
> diff --git a/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java b/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java
> index 2a1a4ad..1fc73b4 100644
> --- a/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java
> +++ b/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ public void testDerefTagIssue23() throws IOException {
> }
>
> public void testDerefTaggedTagTree() throws IOException {
> - assertEquals("269e1253bad5c247c6bde37aa48ae1e03138206c",db.resolve("refs/tags/C").name());
> + assertEquals("be83157b4ffe650d728ba4f98ad47b623b0d0c20",db.resolve("refs/tags/C").name());
> assertEquals("d86a2aada2f5e7ccf6f11880bfb9ab404e8a8864",db.resolve("refs/tags/C^{commit}").name());
> assertEquals("856ec208ae6cadac25a6d74f19b12bb27a24fe24",db.resolve("refs/tags/C^{tree}").name());
> }
> My guess is you added to original test tag C manually so it got an "non-deterministic" time stamp.
-- robin