Re: Revert behavior [Was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] yap: Yet Another (Git) Porcelain]
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Sep 9, 2008, 21:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080909212834.GC10544@machine.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <200809091538.13961.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> By the way, I think the fact that in different SCMs meaning of > "$scm revert" and of "$scm reset" differs widely caused Mercurial > to adopt "hg backout" for creating a commit which reverts changes > (cherry-pick -R), and "hg rollback" to undo last commit.
This brings up a point I wanted to raise - sometimes when the meanings across the systems (including Git) are too conflicting, it should be considered to use a completely different command name whatsoever to reduce the confusion. This is e.g. the reason Cogito had no "pull" (but "update") or "checkout" (but "restore" and "switch") commands.
Petr "Pasky" Baudis