Re: [RFC] cherry-pick using multiple parents to implement -x
- From
Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl>
- Date
- Sep 8, 2008, 06:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080908065723.GA29969@cuci.nl>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080908014959.GA29129@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >> >But then it will fail to find legitimate merge bases. So yes, you _can_
>> Will it? Can you give me one example where it would find the wrong one?
Show 5 quoted lines
>How about the example I gave already? The first merge-base is E, but >that is not correct for the merge I gave. So you propose an algorithm >which will find A. But now imagine the exact some topology, but there >was no cherry-pick; instead, E' is actually a merge. Wouldn't E be the >right merge-base then?
Indeed. Q.E.D. I'll drop the idea with the parentlinks.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
The Horkheimer Effect: "The odds of it being cloudy are directly proportional
to the importance of an astronomical event."