Re: [EGIT PATCH 10/11] Add a TreeWalk iterator implementation for IContainer
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Aug 14, 2008, 04:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080814041941.GA11232@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200808132241.45402.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> söndagen den 10 augusti 2008 10.46.25 skrev Shawn O. Pearce:
> > diff --git a/org.spearce.egit.core/src/org/spearce/egit/core/ContainerTreeIterator.java b/org.spearce.egit.core/src/org/spearce/egit/core/ContainerTreeIterator.java
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..17b8414
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/org.spearce.egit.core/src/org/spearce/egit/core/ContainerTreeIterator.java
> ...
> > + @Override
> > + protected Entry[] getEntries() throws IOException {
> > + final IResource[] all;
> > + try {
> > + all = node.members(IContainer.INCLUDE_HIDDEN);
>
> INCLUDE_HIDDEN is a 3.4 flag.Oh. Can you amend that to be 0?
I'd rather not rebuild my entire branch space just for this one minor change so I can resend the patch. I've got far too many large open branches as it is, with everything depending on everything else. :-|
-- Shawn.