Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2008, 17:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080730172532.GF32057@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vabg09rye.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:43:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> By the way, this eval shows why "theirs" cannot be a symmetric operation > of "ours". You are taking the last remote HEAD even when you are merging > more than one remote into the current branch at once. "ours" can be > sensibly defined for an octopus, but "theirs" has this "which theirs" > problem ;-)
Oh, well, sure. But _if_ it turns out there is a demand for that kind of git-merge-theirs, then I suppose we could still give up if we are given two or more remotes, just like merge-resolve and others do.