Re: [EGIT] Supported Eclipse version

From: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Date: Jul 25, 2008, 19:35 UTC
Message-ID: <200807252135.41434.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080725161652.GA21117@spearce.org>

fredagen den 25 juli 2008 18.16.52 skrev Shawn O. Pearce:

Show 16 quoted lines

> Marek Zawirski <marek.zawirski@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Jean-François Veillette wrote:
> >>> Maybe some users (or developers) from mailing list can tell us about  
> >>> their opinion?
> >>
> >> I think keeping comptability for one version behind the 'current'  
> >> (still compatible 3.3 while 3.4 is the current) is a reasonable goal.
> >> 3.2 is relatively far behind, tools vendor had time to get up to date  
> >> by now.
> >
> > Robin, Shawn, would you accept next patches using 3.3 API?
> 
> Yes, we should be dropping support for 3.2 now and supporting only
> 3.3 and 3.4 going forward.  3.2 is ancient and anyone who is serious
> aboug using Git with Eclipse really should be on a more current
> version of the tools.

We already dropped 3.2 compatibility with the push/fetch support. That was an accident, of course.

Support for 3.3 could also end ahead of schedule if we absolutely need some feature that is only available in 3.4. We'll discuss that then, when/if it happens. The plan is to support 3.3 until 3.5 is out (or even longer if that requires no effort).

So much for intent. We reserve the right to change our minds or make mistakes without notice.

-- robin