Re: sparse fetch, was Re: [PATCH 08/12] git-clone: support --path to do sparse clone
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 24, 2008, 18:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080724182813.GA21186@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807241837441.8986@racer>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:41:03PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > As a user, I would expect "sparse clone" to also be sparse on the > > fetching. That is, to not even bother fetching tree objects that we are > > not going to check out. But that is a whole other can of worms from > > local sparseness, so I think it is worth saving for a different series. > > I think this is not even worth of a series. Sure, it would have benefits > for those who want sparse checkouts. But it comes for a high price on > everyone else:
I agree there are a lot of issues. I am just thinking of the person who said they had a >100G repository. But I am also not volunteering to do it, so I will let somebody who really cares about it try to defend the idea.
-Peff