Re: [PATCH] Fix update-index --refresh for submodules if stat(2) returns st_size 0
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2008, 16:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080722164604.GA3766@blimp.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <4885897C.8010401@viscovery.net>
Johannes Sixt, Tue, Jul 22, 2008 09:17:16 +0200:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Alex Riesen schrieb: > > Can MSys folks please try it? I noticed it when the test > > t2103-update-index-ignore-missing.sh (the 5th case) started failing. > > I tested it. mingw.git does suffer from the problem, and this fixes it. >
Yes, I did too (at work).
> > + if ((changed & DATA_CHANGED) && (ce->ce_size != 0 || S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) > > Does this mean that ce->ce_size is non-zero for gitlinks, at least on > Unix?
It is non-zero for directories (which is what gitlinks are in working directories) on UNIX operating systems I met.
> Is this value useful in anyway?
Sometimes it is (the size a directory takes on storage)
> I don't think so. Then it shouldn't be a random value that lstat() > happens to return.
The problem is: it is not random. I even suspect that Windows is the ONLY system which has st_size 0 for directories.