Re: git-diff/git-format-patch safe for GNU (or POSIX) patch?
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- Jun 26, 2008, 12:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080626124927.GA17731@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <58284.213.203.159.164.1214480989.squirrel@upmail.polettix.it>
On 2008-06-26 13:49:49 +0200, Flavio Poletti wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Importing wasn't actually an issue, just a matter of > init/add/commit. I was more scared about the patch production > process, i.e. producing a patch that could be perfectly usable by > the project's maintainers. But given what you kindly said, I think I > can dismiss this as excess of caution by me.
Yes, patch is one of the most permissive programs around. It will eat _anything_. (And throw up on the carpet if it was just too wrong.)
There are two things in git patches that patch won't grok: rename/copy patches, and binary patches. Neither feature is on by default, IIRC -- you have to give command line flags -- precisely so that "git diff" default output will be patch compatible.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle