Re: [PATCH 00/11] Build in merge
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Jun 21, 2008, 00:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080621003243.GF29404@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4p7oq029.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:04:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > As usual, comments are welcome. :-) > > Thanks. > > I take that last line of comment to mean "this is still RFC and not for > inclusion yet" ;-) I think the series is fine up to eighth patch (get > octopus merge base).
In fact only the version that had "WIP" in the subject was sent not for inclusion. ;-)
> I'll queue the whole thing (still strictly as "test merge" basis) to 'pu'; > I've fixed 3 "old-style C function definition" issues you have in the > tenth patch (build in merge), and I have some other issues with the ninth > one (filter independent).
Thanks. I'm using the kernel's scripts/checkpatch.pl, but it does not have such a check, and I missed it.
Currently I have 12 patches in my branch; if there will be no objections to the new "filter independent" one, then I will resend the series excluding the first 8 to avoid unnecessary traffic, if that is OK to you.