Re: [RFCv2/FYI] git-sequencer.txt
- From
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
- Date
- Jun 13, 2008, 12:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080613121607.GC7925@leksak.fem-net>
- In-Reply-To
- <4851FFE9.30108@gnu.org>
Show 6 quoted lines
>> squash [<options>] --from <mark>:: >> Squash all commits from the given mark into one commit. >> There must not be any `merge` instructions between the >> `mark` instruction and this `squash --from` instruction. > > --after maybe?
I have no idea what is best here ;-) Something that seems intuitive when you see:
merge ... mark :5 pick 666babe patch foo.patch pick fa1afe1
Now? 1) squash --up-to :5 2) squash --from :5 3) squash --after :5
(1) suggests the wrong direction... My English feeling says that (2) "squash from" is better than (3) "squash after", but I'm not a native speaker ;-)
Regards, Stephan
-- Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F