Re: General question about minimal documentation patches

From: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Date: Jun 6, 2008, 22:46 UTC
Message-ID: <20080606224604.GE31040@leksak.fem-net>
In-Reply-To: <4849B8E8.1090506@dirk.my1.cc>

Hi,

> Do you mind if people submit _very_ minimal patches for the
> docs that fix only some typing errors or the like? I, personally,
> am a friend of correct spelling and such and when I discover
> such errors I prefer to have them fixed.

I don't see a reason why tiny documentation fixes (be it typos or not) should be less important than tiny feature code fixes, so imho it is totally ok ;-)

Out of curiosity I looked for typo-only fixes in git, and found:
88f6dbaf99f43053f86474b28beedd91e77c64d9
	builtin-apply: typofix
e77b0b5d0fdac411607dbae11ccad87dccd332d3
	git-am: fix typo in usage message
ed020917147ca733477a0186f3bb1791ec6e5b5c
	Documentation/git-web--browse.txt: fix small typo
51836e9e125f67aa26724154757b4734c08057e4
	Documentation/git-submodule: typofix
ca593f795994badf7cd543d24d1ed24aabc0d8e1
	Documentation/git-request-pull: Fixed a typo ("send" -> "end")
and so on ;-)

What I want to say: just send the patches in ;-)

Regards,
  Stephan

-- 
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F