git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git-checkout sometimes silently fails

From
AMAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date
May 7, 2008, 00:54 UTC
Message-ID
<20080506175442.845ca8fa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To
<20080507001919.GA8633@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:19:19 -0400 Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 35 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 05:10:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > > > y:/usr/src/git26> git-checkout master
> > > > Switched to branch "master"
> > > > y:/usr/src/git26> cat kernel/*.c|sum
> > > > 34439  2057
> > > > y:/usr/src/git26> git-checkout linux-next
> > > > Switched to branch "linux-next"
> > > > y:/usr/src/git26> cat kernel/*.c|sum     
> > > > 34439  2057
> > > 
> > > This is not a good indication of a failed checkout (they could point
> > > to the same commit, for one).
> > 
> > How could they?  linux-next includes a directory called ./Next and a file
> > in that directory called ./Next/Trees, and that is not present after the
> > `git-checkout linux-next'.
> 
> But you don't show us that in your example. There is nothing in your
> example to indicate that they are not simply pointing at the same
> commit...
> 
> > > Try "gitk master...linux-next" (or "git
> > > log master..linux-next", "git diff master linux-next")
> > 
> > These come up empty.  But there is a 12.4MB diff between mainline and
> > linux-next.
> 
> And if these all come up empty, then they _are_ pointing to the same
> commit. When you say "but there is a 12.4MB diff..." do you mean "there
> _should_ be such a diff?" In that case, it seems that your linux-next
> ref is pointing to an unexpected commit.
> 
> So the problem is not with git-checkout, but rather that you are not
> checking out what you think you are checking out.
That sounds a decent theory.
> And so we need to
> figure out how you got into that state.

Well it happens pretty regularly. I have now lost that state but I'll save it next time. I'm not able to pinpoint exactly what causes it to occur.

> What command did you use to create the linux-next branch?
I edited 

y:/usr/src/git26> cat .git/branches/linux-next git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git

and did git-fetch once per day, approx.
> Have you used
> git-reset to move the branch tip around?
My git-fetching script does that:
doit()
{
	tree=$1
	upstream=$2
	cd $GIT_TREE
	git reset --hard "$upstream"
	git fetch "$tree" || exit 1
	git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null
	{
		git_header "$tree"
		git log --no-merges ORIG_HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
		git diff --patch-with-stat ORIG_HEAD
	} >$PULL/$tree.patch
	{
		echo DESC
		echo $tree.patch
		echo EDESC
		git_header "$tree"
		git log --no-merges ORIG_HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
	} >$PULL/$tree.txt
	git reset --hard "$upstream"
}

(Linus suggested an updated version of this but afaict that won't change anything)

But, as I say, usually this script leaves the tree in a sane state. But sometimes it leaves it in a i-cant-check-stuff-out state. It's not specific to linux-next, either: I've seen this for a long time, on and off. Prior to linux-next's existence.

Previous: Jeff KingNext: Björn Steinbrink
Message 8 of 10 in “git-checkout sometimes silently fails”
  1. Andrew MortonMay 6, 2008
  2. Alex RiesenMay 6, 2008
  3. Andrew MortonMay 7, 2008
  4. Junio C HamanoMay 7, 2008
  5. Andrew MortonMay 7, 2008
  6. J. Bruce FieldsMay 7, 2008
  7. Jeff KingMay 7, 2008
  8. Andrew MortonMay 7, 2008
  9. Björn SteinbrinkMay 7, 2008
  10. Johannes SixtMay 7, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.