Re: Binary files in format-patch
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- May 5, 2008, 23:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080505230153.GL29038@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <d280d7f10805051555x67bd7e87o999a2c9e19663b92@mail.gmail.com>
Caio Marcelo <cmarcelo@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using "git format-patch" to generate messages for a code review > mailing list. It work fine except when we have binary files involved. > Their contents are not relevant for us, and doesn't help much in a > mailing list. Taking a peek at the code I've found out this:
Why then are they committed in Git and being modified? If the files aren't relevant, why are they tracked?
-- Shawn.