Re: [PATCH] git-bisect.sh: don't accidentally override existing branch "bisect"
- From
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- Date
- Apr 30, 2008, 21:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200804302330.18354.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080430164613.28314.qmail@b31db398e1accc.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
Le mercredi 30 avril 2008, Gerrit Pape a écrit :
Show 49 quoted lines
> If a branch named "bisect" or "new-bisect" already was created in the
> repo by other means than git bisect, doing a git bisect used to override
> the branch without a warning. Now if the branch "bisect" or
> "new-bisect" already exists, and it was not created by git bisect itself,
> git bisect start fails with an appropriate error message. Additionally,
> if checking out a new bisect state fails due to a merge problem, git
> bisect cleans up the temporary branch "new-bisect".
>
> The accidental override has been noticed by Andres Salomon, reported
> through
> http://bugs.debian.org/478647
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
> ---
> Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 2 +-
> git-bisect.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> index 698ffde..1c7e38d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original
> head, do a $ git bisect reset
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> -to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the
> +to get back to the original branch, instead of being in one of the
> bisection branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too,
> actually: it will reset the bisection state, and before it does that
> it checks that you're not using some old bisection branch).
> diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
> index d8d9bfd..48d81d5 100755
> --- a/git-bisect.sh
> +++ b/git-bisect.sh
> @@ -69,14 +69,19 @@ bisect_start() {
> head=$(GIT_DIR="$GIT_DIR" git symbolic-ref -q HEAD) ||
> head=$(GIT_DIR="$GIT_DIR" git rev-parse --verify HEAD) ||
> die "Bad HEAD - I need a HEAD"
> + #
> + # Check that we either already have BISECT_START, or that the
> + # branches bisect, new-bisect don't exist, to not override them.
> + #
> + test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" ||
> + if git show-ref bisect > /dev/null ||
> + git show-ref new-bisect > /dev/null; then
> + die 'The branches "bisect" and "new-bisect" must not exist.'
> + fiMinor nitpick: you may use:
git show-ref -q {new-,}bisectinstead of:
git show-ref bisect > /dev/null || git show-ref new-bisect > /dev/null
That would give something like:
test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" ||
git show-ref -q {new-,}bisect &&
die 'The branches "bisect" and "new-bisect" must not exist.'Show 20 quoted lines
> start_head=''
> case "$head" in
> refs/heads/bisect)
> - if [ -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" ]; then
> - branch=`cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START"`
> - else
> - branch=master
> - fi
> + branch=`cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START"`
> git checkout $branch || exit
> ;;
> refs/heads/*|$_x40)
> @@ -329,7 +334,10 @@ bisect_next() {
>
> echo "Bisecting: $bisect_nr revisions left to test after this"
> git branch -f new-bisect "$bisect_rev"
> - git checkout -q new-bisect || exit
> + git checkout -q new-bisect || {
> + git branch -d new-bisect
> + exitHere we "exit 0" if "git branch -d new-bisect" succeeds. That seems wrong.
Show 34 quoted lines
> + } > git branch -M new-bisect bisect > git show-branch "$bisect_rev" > } > diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh > index 5e3e544..05f1e15 100755 > --- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh > +++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh > @@ -284,6 +284,24 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect starting with a detached > HEAD' ' > > ' > > +test_expect_success 'bisect refuses to start if branch bisect exists' ' > + git bisect reset && > + git branch bisect && > + test_must_fail git bisect start && > + git branch -d bisect && > + git checkout -b bisect && > + test_must_fail git bisect start && > + git checkout master && > + git branch -d bisect > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'bisect refuses to start if branch new-bisect > exists' ' + git bisect reset && > + git branch new-bisect && > + test_must_fail git bisect start && > + git branch -d new-bisect > +' > + > # > # > test_done
Otherwise the patch looks good.
Thanks, Christian.