Re: [PATCH] Add new git-graph command
- From
- Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
- Date
- Apr 1, 2008, 04:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200804010729.51202.tlikonen@iki.fi>
- In-Reply-To
- <9b3e2dc20803312105i1f890784v29928321e3e51374@mail.gmail.com>
Stephen Sinclair kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > I just want to say that I really like your 'git graph'. I would > > like to see it integrated to 'git log', perhaps as 'git log > > --pretty=graph' or 'git log --graph'. > > Any reason? > > I don't see why it's necessary to bundle all useful commands into one > big super-command. I like the idea of typing "git-graph". > Then again, I happen to like the git-command syntax which seems to > have fallen out of favour, so don't pay attention to me.
Adam's 'git graph' is a way of viewing log (in terminal environment), it looks very similar to 'git log --pretty=oneline' and it accepts very much the same command line options. That's why I see 'git log' being logical place for such functionality.
Actually, to me it would be more logical if 'git whatchanged' was 'git log --changed' or '--verbose / -v' something.