Re: warning: no common commits - slow pull

From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mar 8, 2008, 22:48 UTC
Message-ID: <200803081448.47000.david-b@pacbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0803072006550.19665@iabervon.org>

On Friday 07 March 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > When I "git pull" it first fetches a bunch of files, then
> > concludes (wrongly) "no common commits", then starts a
> > second fetch of a *HUGE* number of files ... 400 MB is too
> > much to pay when updating from rc3-last-week to rc4.  But
> > if I interrupt that second one with ^C, it seems that the
> > first one fetched enough to make the next "git pull" go
> > pretty quickly.
> 
> Actually, if you can make a tarball of the .git directory of one of those 
> workspaces, and see if the bug is reproducable with that .git directory 
> every time (particularly when pulling a local repository), it would be 
> really helpful to have a reliable test case.

Seems to be. Let me know where I can stash a ~300 MB tar.bz2 file for you ...

> There's a debugging thing that would help, but it's not in your version.

So I updated.  :)

Show 10 quoted lines

> It's in next as
> 
> 49aaddd102aff Teach upload-pack to log the received need lines to an fd
> 
> With that commit, you should be able to do:
> 
> GIT_DEBUG_SEND_PACK=3 git pull 3>UPLOAD_LOG
> 
> and get a file UPLOAD_LOG that will show what it's doing, although there's 
> a reasonable chance that it'll only demonstrate that it's doing nothing

That file has always been empty.

> helpful, which we already pretty much know.

Oddly, a few times when I tried that the bug didn't reproduce. One factor may be workspaces cloned a long time ago with early versions of GIT (or cogito).

- Dave