Re: cookbook question
- From
Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
- Date
- Feb 28, 2008, 23:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080228232031.GB31479@hashpling.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <47C73ED3.6000704@krose.org>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:08:03PM -0500, Kyle Rose wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> The rebase just avoids unnecessary merge records. What I really want is my > changes placed on top of whatever the common head is at any one time, which > by design means I would use rebase. Aside from the cleanliness of the > history, I'm not sure there is a real reason to do this. But I like things > clean. ;-)
rebase should just reorder the patches in the simple cases, so it should do what you want. Either you've found a bug in rebase or you're doing something unconventional.