Re: rm and mv commands: should I use them?
- From
Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
- Date
- Jan 6, 2008, 08:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080106080801.GA1483@bulgaria.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <379EDA94-A67B-483A-BC5F-E961DD52AD0C@gmail.com>
[Jon Hancock <redstarling@gmail.com>]
Show 8 quoted lines
> > So, do I need to use git's mv and rm commands? Can't I just rename, add, > and remove files using any means I like and then just ensure my "index" is > staged properly when I do a commit? Additionally, is there a simple > procedure with git to say: "I want to version exactly what is in my working > tree. If I removed something or added something, just handle it". This is > sort of what "git add ." does, but "git add" doesn't handling things I > removed or moved, correct?
"git add ." only adds new or modified files to the index. You can use "git add -u ." to update the index to reflect any deleted files.
Brian