Re: Problem with git-svn
- From
- Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2007, 18:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071220183007.GA26767@untitled>
- In-Reply-To
- <47690031.7090409@obry.net>
Pascal Obry <pascal.obry@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> Hi Eric, > > > Can you show me the output of `svn log -v -r9458 svn+ssh://myserver/'? > > $ svn log -v -r9458 svn+ssh://myserver/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r9458 | (no author) | 1998-04-22 19:07:08 +0200 (Wed, 22 Apr 1998) | 1 line > Changed paths: > A /importfromcvs > A /importfromcvs/branches > A /importfromcvs/tags > A /importfromcvs/trunk > > New repository initialized by cvs2svn. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > So did svn+ssh://importfromcvs/trunk/file.el at r9458? If so, git-svn > > is behaving as expected. If not, can you tell me where "file.el" was at > > r9458? > > file.el was not imported at r9458 but at r9459, just after the creation > of the /importfromcvs directories above. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r9459 | author | 1998-04-22 19:07:08 +0200 (Wed, 22 Apr 1998) | 2 lines > Changed paths: > A /importfromcvs/trunk/file.el > > Initial revision > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, oops, I was off-by-one with the revision number. But git-svn does look to be doing the right thing here, because it followed history into /importfromcvs/trunk/ and file.el was part of it.
-- Eric Wong