Re: git-svn: surprising behaviors/bugs?
- From
- Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
- Date
- Nov 29, 2007, 08:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071129081031.GF32277@soma>
- In-Reply-To
- <bf7b2dda0711220537h3f37c84ag899b74daa9a8fe1f@mail.gmail.com>
Gustaf Hendeby <hendeby@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> I've been running git for most my stuff for some time now, and am > really pleased with what it has to offer. However, all my coworkers > aren't gitified yet, and therefore I sometimes have to work with svn. > I've learned to appreciate git-svn for this, since it lets me utilize > the strengths of git and still allows for my coworkers to think I use > their svn setup. Thanks to all who contribute to this wonderful > tools! > > In my work with git-svn I have stumbled upon the following two > unexpected behaviors. Basically, am I doing/understanding something > wrong, or is this buggy behavior in git-svn? (I'm presently using git > 1.5.3.6, but have been experiencing these things for a while.) > > > 1. I don't really like svn's committer info, so I got an authorsfile > set. This works great when I'm fetching/dcommitting from the > top-directory in my git checkout (the one with .git in), however, if > I'm in a subdirectory the authorsfile doesn't kick in and I get the > svn commiter info. This is not a big deal, but a bit surprising and > my history gets a bit ugly.
I see you've already fixed that. Thanks.
Show 11 quoted lines
> 2. My second problem involves getting the support in git-svn for tags > and branches to work. Having a standard layout of the svn repository, > in this case > /source/project/(trunk|branch|tags) > svn clone -s only works as expected sometimes. Sometimes I only get > the revision history, not including any actual content (ie none files > of the files under control turns up in git) from the clone. When I > get this problem I usually clone the trunk only, and add tags myself. > This is far from optimal, and also error prone. Other times, the > clone works as expected and gives me the tags and branches and all the > content.
Any chance there's a BOFH at the other end playing around with permissions while you were testing?
Show 7 quoted lines
> I think the problem occurs when I'm not the owner of the svn > repository, and only have access (read/write) to the > project/(trunk|branch|tag) part, and don't have any access at all to > source. Ie, svn ls works for /source/project and > /source/project/trunk etc, but not /source (where I returns 403 > Forbidden access). All svn access is through a svn-server that I > can't control myself.
I'll have to look into that some other time.
Does `svn log -v' work for /source/project ?
Am I correct in what you have is currently like this?
[svn-remote "svn"] url = http://domain/ branches = source/project/branches/*:refs/remotes/* tags = source/project/tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/* fetch = source/project/trunk:refs/remotes/trunk
If so, can you change it to something like this?
[svn-remote "svn"] url = http://domain/source/project branches = branches/*:refs/remotes/* tags = tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/* fetch = trunk:refs/remotes/trunk
And see if that works all the time?
Thanks,
-- Eric Wong