Re: [PATCH] Make Git accept absolute path names for files within the work tree
- From
Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
- Date
- Nov 27, 2007, 23:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200711280020.57042.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmyt0edso.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
tisdag 27 november 2007 skrev Junio C Hamano:
> Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> writes:
[...]
> > const char *orig = path; > > Decl after statement.
Stupid C..
Show 7 quoted lines
> > I do not think there is fundamental reason to object to this change, as > long as the prefixing is done to the path that is trying to name a path > in the working tree. > > Also some codepath that does not require any work tree may want to call > prefix_path(). I do not know what would happen in such a case.
ok, I'll add a test for whether we have a work tree.
> Although I didn't look at all the callers, I think the caller from > config.c is not talking about a path in the work tree, and not all users > of config.c need to have work-tree.
Oh dear. That wasn't on master when I looked. That one seems to be the only "other" use and it is wrapped inside an if (!absolute_path()) tests so my magic does not conflict there.
-- robin