Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: Prepare for a side-band demultiplexer in a thread.

> Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> writes:
> >> If the rationale was "running in a thread is more natural on the
> >> platform", I would understand it.
> >
> > Please take it as such.
> >
> >> But "_must_ run because there is no fork(2)" solicits a "Huh?
> >> How does Cygwin does it then?" from me.
> >
> > Alex has answered this. We are not going to copy Cygwin's fork() into
> > git.
>
> Wholeheartedly agree, and I feel dirty after looking at that
> thing.  Nothing against Cygwin folks, of course.
>
> The reason I wanted to close pipes as early as possible was
> because I did not want to get bitten by "read() waiting forever
> for EOF due to an extra unclosed fd on the writer end of the
> pipe() without the writer not writing anything to it" problem,
> which is an often-seen mistake.