Re: [StGit RFC] A more structured way of calling git
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- Nov 4, 2007, 18:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071104184003.GB6032@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071103142851.GG26436@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
On 2007-11-03 15:28:51 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> This reminds me of someone suggesting that some patches could be > represented by more than one commit.
You might be remebering me pointing out that the old infrastructure supported (or at least not directly disallowed) this.
> But I'm not sure such a beast would be useful - I fear that would > make StGIT much more complicated, but would it really make things > better?
Yes, it makes everything much more complicated, and no, it doesn't buy us anything new. After all, once we know the parent and the tree we want a patch to have, we can just manufacture a commit that has that tree and that parent.
My proposed new infrastructure cannot represent such patches, very much by design.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle