Re: cogito and remote#branch, was Re: [PATCH] Git homepage: remove all the references to Cogito

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Oct 31, 2007, 17:09 UTC
Message-ID: <20071031170951.GR18279@machine.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <2c6b72b30710161516j5c029847r1acb3ce2d88344a1@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:25AM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote:

Show 25 quoted lines

> On 10/16/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > I'm not sure this is good idea, Cogito is still quite frequently used
> > > and it should be documented that it exists.
> >
> > I agree.  But maybe it could be marked as unmaintained?  Maybe someone
> > steps up to maintain it.  Or, even better, comes up with a list of "this
> > is what I like do regularly with cogito, but there's no easy way with core
> > git" issues.
> 
> One thing that I occasionally miss is
> 
>   cg-export /path/to/directory/
> 
> And yes, I know it can be accomplished via "obscurities" like
> git-archive+tar (or worse git-checkout-index) but I think having
> an easy way to checkout to a directory could be great (and possibly
> with the ability to apply substitutions with the recent discussion).
> 
> Else, I am really looking forward for the option parser work to provide
> an easy way to list options. I found it very useful with Cogito.
> Also, most of the "status" commands in Cogito seemd to provide a richer
> default output geared towards human consumption. For example stuff like
> git-branch -v and git remote -v flags would have been the default for
> Cogito ... I think.

A "me too" mail for once...

I fully second this. cg-export is one of the Cogito commands I still use frequently. I wonder if there is any obvious piece of Git command set we could glue this on (so that we don't introduce Yet Another Command)... I think cg-export is better-named here than git-archive. ;-)

And some command in Git to easily get the equivalent of cg-status -g output is something I probably miss the most in Git now. (Originally I was about to say that I just miss an equivalent of cg-status, but thinking about it, most of the time I'm interested only in either -g (long branch info) or -w (git status output)).

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
We don't know who it was that discovered water, but we're pretty sure
that it wasn't a fish.		-- Marshall McLuhan