Re: [BUG] git remote add failure
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Oct 19, 2007, 00:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071019002017.GP14735@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710181708230.25221@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Guido Ostkamp wrote: > > > I think I've found a bug in "git remote add". I tried the following: > > > > $ git remote add -f spearce2 http://repo.or.cz/git/spearce.git > > Cannot get the repository state from http://repo.or.cz/git/spearce.git > > fetch spearce2: command returned error: 1 > > > > Obviously I used the wrong URI. Then I tried again: > > > > $ git remote add -f spearce2 http://repo.or.cz/r/git/spearce.git > > remote spearce2 already exists. > > > > I think Git should not store the bad info and block the name when the > > first call wasn't successfull. > > The problem there is of course that the fetch could fail because you are > offline. In that case, you do not want git remote to throw the > information away.
Right. But maybe there should be an easier way for the user to "force" adding the remote over the existing remote. Much like how they can force creating a branch over an existing branch.
Too bad -f is already taken. :-\
-- Shawn.