Re: [PATCH] rev-list documentation: add "--bisect-all".
- From
- Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenhues@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2007, 10:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071016104257.GB1170@ins.uni-bonn.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071016055905.55c1d280.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Hello,
A couple of typos:
* Christian Couder wrote on Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 05:59:05AM CEST:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt > index 7cd0e89..f6dd0c4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
[...]
Show 12 quoted lines
> @@ -354,6 +355,21 @@ the expected number of commits to be tested if `bisect_rev` > turns out to be bad to `bisect_bad`, and the number of commits > we are bisecting right now to `bisect_all`. > > +--bisect-all:: > + > +This outputs all the commit objects between the included and excluded > +commits, ordered by their distance to the included and excluded > +commits. The farthest from them is displayed first. (This is the only > +one displayed by `--bisect`.) > + > +This is usefull because it makes it easy to choose a good commit to
s/usefull/useful/
Show 6 quoted lines
> +test when you want to avoid to test some of them for some reason (they > +may not compile for example). > + > +This option can be used along with `--bisect-vars`, in this case, > +after all the sorted commit objects, there will be the same text as if > +`--bisect-vars` has been used alone.
s/has/had/
Cheers, Ralf